Investment Management
Lifepay Group, LLCAbout
Important information
- Government Actions:Government Action: BBB reports on known government actions involving business’ marketplace conduct:SEC Charges Texas Company, Principals in Multimillion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Targeting Seniors
SEC Charges Texas Company, Principals in Multimillion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Targeting Seniors
Litigation Release No. 24107 / April 10, 2018
Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Lifepay Group, LLC, et. al., No. 4:18-cv-01098
On April 6, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission
charged two Texas companies and their principals in a $2.4 million Ponzi
scheme and in a related, $1.4 million offering fraud targeting
retirees.The SEC's complaint alleges that, from 2010 to 2017, Clifton E.
Stanley ran a Ponzi scheme through his retirement planning and real
estate investment business, The Lifepay Group, LLC. Stanley is alleged
to have lured at least thirty elderly victims to invest approximately
$2.4 million of their retirement savings with baseless promises and
claims of outsized investment returns. He kept the scheme afloat for
years by paying early investors with later investors' funds and by
convincing investors to roll over their investments. The SEC further
alleges that Stanley pilfered from the estate of an elderly woman's
family trust, diverting nearly $100,000 to fund the Lifepay Ponzi
scheme. In addition, the SEC's complaint alleges that, beginning in
2015, Stanley and Michael E. Watts orchestrated a second offering fraud
through a company they controlled, SMDRE, LLC. Stanley and Watts
allegedly used a collection of misrepresentations and empty promises to
convince a group of predominantly elderly victims to invest roughly $1.4
million in SMDRE.Stanley is alleged to have used roughly $1.3 million of the
Lifepay offering proceeds for personal expenses, including country club
memberships, daily living expenses, travel, and entertainment expenses.
In addition, Watts and Stanley allegedly engaged in shell game
transactions so they could use the vast majority of SMDRE investor funds
for personal expenses and to keep the Lifepay Ponzi scheme afloat.The SEC's complaint charges Stanley, Watts, Lifepay, and SMDRE
with violating Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of
1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange
Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten
gains plus interest, penalties, and injunctive relief. Stanley was also
charged with violating Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act for his role
as an unregistered broker.The SEC's investigation was conducted by Tom Keltner and Carol
Hahn and supervised by Scott F. Mascianica. The SEC's litigation will
be led by Timothy S. McCole.
BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.