Aerospace Industry
Parametric Solutions IncAbout
Important information
- Pending Government Action:Government Action: BBB reports on known government actions involving business’ marketplace conduct:3:21-cr-00220-VAB All Defendants USA v. Patel et al
As of February 18, 2022
A
federal grand jury in Bridgeport, Connecticut, returned an indictment
yesterday charging a former manager of a major aerospace engineering
company and five executives of outsource engineering suppliers
(Suppliers) for participating in a long-running conspiracy to restrict
the hiring and recruiting of employees among their respective companies.
The conspiracy affected thousands of engineers and other skilled
workers in the aerospace industry who perform services in the design,
manufacturing and servicing of aircraft components for both commercial
and military purposes.According to the one-count felony indictment unsealed today in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, six individuals —
Mahesh Patel, of Connecticut; Robert Harvey, of South Carolina; Harpreet
Wasan, of Connecticut; Steven Houghtaling, of Connecticut; Tom Edwards,
of Connecticut; and Gary Prus, of Florida — conspired with unnamed
others to allocate employees by agreeing not to hire or solicit
employees from each other’s companies.This indictment is the first in an ongoing investigation into labor
market allocation in the aerospace engineering services industry. Patel,
described as a leader of the conspiracy given his position and
authority as the Suppliers’ common customer, was previously charged by
complaint. He was arrested and appeared before a federal magistrate
judge on the charge last week, and was released on a $100,000 appearance
bond. The remaining defendants are expected to appear before federal
district courts in different districts this week.
According to the indictment, the defendants and co-conspirators
recognized the mutual financial benefit of the conspiracy — namely,
reducing the rise in labor costs that would occur when aerospace workers
were free to find new employment in a competitive environment. Patel
and certain other co-conspirators explicitly appealed to this financial
benefit when communicating with each other about the agreement.The charges
are the result of an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into labor
market allocation in the aerospace engineering services industry,
conducted by the Antitrust Division’s New York Office, the U.S.
Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut, and the New Haven and
New York Resident Agencies of DCIS. Anyone with information in
connection with this investigation should contact the Antitrust
Division’s Complaint Center at 888-647-3258, or visit
http://www.justice.gov/atr/report-violations.An indictment merely alleges that a crime has been committed, and all
defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt in a court of law.LINK:
As of February 18, 2022
A
federal grand jury in Bridgeport, Connecticut, returned an indictment
yesterday charging a former manager of a major aerospace engineering
company and five executives of outsource engineering suppliers
(Suppliers) for participating in a long-running conspiracy to restrict
the hiring and recruiting of employees among their respective companies.
The conspiracy affected thousands of engineers and other skilled
workers in the aerospace industry who perform services in the design,
manufacturing and servicing of aircraft components for both commercial
and military purposes.According to the one-count felony indictment unsealed today in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, six individuals —
Mahesh Patel, of Connecticut; Robert Harvey, of South Carolina; Harpreet
Wasan, of Connecticut; Steven Houghtaling, of Connecticut; Tom Edwards,
of Connecticut; and Gary Prus, of Florida — conspired with unnamed
others to allocate employees by agreeing not to hire or solicit
employees from each other’s companies.This indictment is the first in an ongoing investigation into labor
market allocation in the aerospace engineering services industry. Patel,
described as a leader of the conspiracy given his position and
authority as the Suppliers’ common customer, was previously charged by
complaint. He was arrested and appeared before a federal magistrate
judge on the charge last week, and was released on a $100,000 appearance
bond. The remaining defendants are expected to appear before federal
district courts in different districts this week.
According to the indictment, the defendants and co-conspirators
recognized the mutual financial benefit of the conspiracy — namely,
reducing the rise in labor costs that would occur when aerospace workers
were free to find new employment in a competitive environment. Patel
and certain other co-conspirators explicitly appealed to this financial
benefit when communicating with each other about the agreement.The charges
are the result of an ongoing federal antitrust investigation into labor
market allocation in the aerospace engineering services industry,
conducted by the Antitrust Division’s New York Office, the U.S.
Attorney’s Office for the District of Connecticut, and the New Haven and
New York Resident Agencies of DCIS. Anyone with information in
connection with this investigation should contact the Antitrust
Division’s Complaint Center at 888-647-3258, or visit
http://www.justice.gov/atr/report-violations.An indictment merely alleges that a crime has been committed, and all
defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt in a court of law.LINK: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/six-aerospace-executives-and-managers-indicted-leading-roles-labor-market-conspiracy-1
BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period, except for customer reviews. Customer reviews posted prior to July 5, 2024, will no longer be published when they reach three years from their submission date. Customer reviews posted on/after July 5, 2024, will be published indefinitely unless otherwise voluntarily retracted by the user who submitted the content, or BBB no longer believes the review is authentic. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this company, please let them know that you checked their record with BBB.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.